<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OWL BASIC runtime library takes shape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smallshire.org.uk/sufficientlysmall/2009/02/11/owl-basic-runtime-library-takes-shape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smallshire.org.uk/sufficientlysmall/2009/02/11/owl-basic-runtime-library-takes-shape/</link>
	<description>sin(x) = x</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:44:45 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Smallshire</title>
		<link>http://www.smallshire.org.uk/sufficientlysmall/2009/02/11/owl-basic-runtime-library-takes-shape/comment-page-1/#comment-2953</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Smallshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallshire.org.uk/sufficientlysmall/2009/02/11/owl-basic-runtime-library-takes-shape/#comment-2953</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2933&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Richard Russell &lt;/a&gt; 
You&#039;re correct that these aren&#039;t available through GDI+.  But GDI+ given us an easy-to-use .NET API which allows us to quickly and easily implement much of what we need to cover.  Our VDU drivers are pretty well decoupled from the actual rendering mechanism, so it won&#039;t be much work to provide a rendering backend for another API, such as GDI as you suggest, or possibly OpenGL to be more cross platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2933" rel="nofollow">@Richard Russell </a><br />
You&#8217;re correct that these aren&#8217;t available through GDI+.  But GDI+ given us an easy-to-use .NET API which allows us to quickly and easily implement much of what we need to cover.  Our VDU drivers are pretty well decoupled from the actual rendering mechanism, so it won&#8217;t be much work to provide a rendering backend for another API, such as GDI as you suggest, or possibly OpenGL to be more cross platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.smallshire.org.uk/sufficientlysmall/2009/02/11/owl-basic-runtime-library-takes-shape/comment-page-1/#comment-2933</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallshire.org.uk/sufficientlysmall/2009/02/11/owl-basic-runtime-library-takes-shape/#comment-2933</guid>
		<description>Since you&#039;re using GDI+ to implement the VDU commands, how are you managing to provide the GCOL &#039;logical plotting&#039; modes (OR, AND, XOR, NOT)?  I thought it was one of the limitations of GDI+ that it provided no equivalent to GDI&#039;s SetROP2 functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you&#8217;re using GDI+ to implement the VDU commands, how are you managing to provide the GCOL &#8216;logical plotting&#8217; modes (OR, AND, XOR, NOT)?  I thought it was one of the limitations of GDI+ that it provided no equivalent to GDI&#8217;s SetROP2 functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
